Asrock H310CM-IB

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-IB (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '21 at 00:16
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 140 60% 98 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 280 33% 255 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3540 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 185 Parallax 122 101% 143 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 106 Splatting 101 93% 116 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NFS011SA312-6007000 120GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1001A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 476 Write 383 Mixed 114 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 1.4 62% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 49.9 DQ Mixed 0.8 22% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 88%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 29GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 155 41 42 40 42 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 475 Mixed 388 SusWrite 128 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 47.8 150% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 338 256% 346 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 121%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	7.08% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 2.7 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 4.4 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 3 142% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 25.6 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 15.3 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	330x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	290x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	276x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	249x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	178x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	106x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	106x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	89x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	116x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	60x
D12.2356WS.001 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 565 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $243

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16