Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR) 13,243 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 70.3 40% 60.5 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 142 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 380A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 8.5 4% 6.87 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 6.3 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 121 115 91 71 131 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.1% Poor	Read 141 Write 140 Mixed 18 SusWrite 114 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 18.7 29% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ 12GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1200, 1200 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	62x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	51x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x

RAM
RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 12GBRamaxelBench 22%, 358 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 467 samples	20x
M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 321 samples	14x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16