MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 85.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 260
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 768
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 940
63% 940 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$1,200
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 271
Parallax 345
229% 300 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 233
Splatting 179
198% 243 fps
Poor: 193%
This bench: 214%
Great: 255%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 386 274 211 169 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 475
Write 271
Mixed 255
SusWrite 264
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 19.7
100% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 168
139% 208 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 134%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
148GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 142 17 25 17 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 454
Write 373
Mixed 330
SusWrite 90
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 19.9
95% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 34.1
42% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 99%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
214GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 142 40 38 129 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 442
Write 381
Mixed 328
SusWrite 115
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 10.8
75% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 39
46% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 99%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
150GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 93 108 139 92 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 1,266
Mixed 981
SusWrite 199
211% 945 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 27.1
137% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 168
171% 294 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 122%
Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 139 152 154 129 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 140
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 4,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $1,726
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback