HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 886B
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '21 at 15:36
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11700F 21,161 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 247 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 573 60% 480 Pts	64-Core 727 45% 727 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.5% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 59.3 Parallax 55.4 48% 57.8 fps	MRender 54.9 Gravity 56.5 Splatting 51 44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-256G-1106 256GB 833 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,556 Write 1672 Mixed 1,389 344% 1,539 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 57.6 186% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 670 DQ Write 509 DQ Mixed 631 461% 603 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 229%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 383GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 125 129 129 124 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 116 Write 122 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 124 72% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 2x8GB 2,284 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23.7 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 26.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 146%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 143%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx

CPU
Core i7-11700FIntelBench 98%, 21,161 samples	200x
Ryzen 7 5700GAMD $174Bench 88%, 17,091 samples	174x
Core i7-11700Intel $225Bench 98%, 20,430 samples	123x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	263x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	200x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	58x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	401x
WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-1T00-1106 1TBWDBench 365%, 738 samples	117x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	37x

RAM
HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 2,284 samples	491x
HP37D4U1S8MR-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 95%, 903 samples	26x
KF3200C16D4/8GX HP37D4U1S8ME-8X KF3200C16D4/8GX HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 32GBKingstonBench 89%, 48 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16