Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7550 895 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 54.4 1-Core 28 2-Core 62 32% 48.1 Pts	4-Core 61.3 8-Core 58.4 8% 59.8 Pts	64-Core 61.2 4% 61.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400M 596 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Apple(106B 00B9) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.9 Reflection 0.6 1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 70 56 58 59 67 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.2% Poor	Read 94.8 Write 78 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 64.7 18% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 10.8 56% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 55.3 DQ Mixed 22.7 22% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 78%
APPLE SD Card Reader 66GB 53GB free, PID 8403 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1.1 1.1 1 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.08% Terrible	Read 3 Write 0.3 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 1.1 2% 1.48 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P7550IntelBench 36%, 895 samples	10x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 9400MNvidiaBench 1%, 596 samples	13x

SSD
C100 240GBGoodramBench 65%, 61 samples	1x
XPG SX930 120GBAdata $229Bench 88%, 1,100 samples	1x
TS64GSSD340K 64GBTranscendBench 56%, 37 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16