HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP 240 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 855A
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime67.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 186
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 178
32% 218 Pts
64-Core 172
12% 172 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 855A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.7
5% 4.7 fps
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.1
9% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 116 74 51 36 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 384
Write 254
Mixed 349
SusWrite 82.9
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 23.9
98% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 48.1
87% 165 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AM1P26KC4U1-BBRS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 240 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback