Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 month ago.
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '21 at 23:15
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$155
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 127
56% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 249
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 250
17% 250 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 66 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 62.1
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 66.2
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$40
367GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.4
Write 71.9
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 72.1
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 3.8
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $445
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $268Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback