Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.01GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
Memory0.7 GB free of 2.00781 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 116
54% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 397
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 8311) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.2
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 109 70 104 74 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 383
Write 186
Mixed 306
SusWrite 120
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 28.5
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 192
164% 239 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
524GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 34 45 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 70
Write 31.1
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 39.2
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 67%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
216GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 76 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 57.7
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 89.8
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
562GB free, PID 022a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 16.7
Mixed 27
SusWrite 26.8
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Winbond 25X/Q Series 2GB
1600, 33 MHz
2048, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback