Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 67.5 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 75.7 41% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 172 17% 139 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AB) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 4.5 4% 5.13 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 343 350 350 350 347 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 449 Mixed 394 SusWrite 348 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 38.5 124% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 293 217% 286 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-3632QMIntelBench 61%, 24,912 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	13x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
S400 120GBEzcoolBench 57%, 487 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16