MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A36
Motherboard	MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 197 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 375 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 40.6 Parallax 38.7 31% 39.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 27.3 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 191 219 293 203 314 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 226 Write 99.3 Mixed 91.7 SusWrite 251 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 11.4 48% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 17.1 DQ Mixed 15.8 12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 100%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 24 26 24 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 108 Write 22.9 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 21.7 42% 42 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 2.2 95% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	153x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	150x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	58x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	89x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	46x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	19x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	18x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	14x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $234

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16