Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 22:46
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 198
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 517
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 87.5
47% 68 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 43.1
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,252
Write 3,207
Mixed 4,087
927% 4,182 MB/s
4K Read 330
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 155
782% 214 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 594
460% 636 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Team L3 SSD 120GB
56GB free
Firmware: S8FM06.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 256 256 256 256 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 355
Write 255
Mixed 209
SusWrite 256
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 17.3
73% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 64.8
74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 71%
WD WD6400AARS-00Y5B1 640GB
68GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 103 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 88.7
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 103
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
26GB free
Firmware: ZM100-47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 36 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 9.3
Write 37.7
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 35.8
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13%
Great: 33%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
91GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 33 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 45.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 31.6
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback