Asus Q505UAR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsus Q505UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q505UAR
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180928
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 204
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 414
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 432
29% 432 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1B00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 0.3
5% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 17 20 32 34 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 25.4
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 17.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Q505UAR Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q505UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback