Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 19.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 229 59% 123 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 564 66% 513 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.1% Average	Lighting 63.3 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 31.2 52% 33.1 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 4.6 18% 24.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 78 56 56 53 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 363 Write 234 Mixed 204 SusWrite 78.4 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 28 84% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 112 90% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 445GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 60 58 60 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 168 Write 171 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 63.7 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.9 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 327 12% 327 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	191x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	180x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	61x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16