Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$102
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 180
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 378
44% 343 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 59.9
47% 61.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 52.7
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 245 80 74 83 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 414
Write 151
Mixed 255
SusWrite 159
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 36.6
135% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 139
134% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 108%
HPT DISK 0_1 500GB
137GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 174 174 173 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 172
Write 141
Mixed 123
SusWrite 170
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.5
7% 2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
HPT DISK 0_0 500GB
39GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 105 96 147 87 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 119
SusWrite 108
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 25.2
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.3
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 66%
ASMT 2105 1TB
84GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 32.8
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 37.7
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $913
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback