Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180214
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	May 18 '21 at 04:04
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 140 58% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 211 25% 194 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1495) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.58% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.58% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB 8,401 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0510E SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 63 65 56 58 55 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.8% Above average	Read 272 Write 222 Mixed 231 SusWrite 96.3 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 36.7 103% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 43.1 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 55.6 45% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 96%
HP S700 120GB-$30 4,522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 34GB free Firmware: Q0330B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0 19 9.6 9.6 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.4% Poor	Read 281 Write 14.9 Mixed 96.3 SusWrite 8.5 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 8.5 40% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 2.9 DQ Mixed 12.2 9% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 95%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 15 8.8 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.36% Terrible	Read 28.6 Write 16.2 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 11.4 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.36% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8KM9 2x4GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 8 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16