| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF B450-PLUS GAMING |
| Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191206 |
| Uptime | 9.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 11 '21 at 16:34 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
39% 297 Pts
|
19% 306 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
0% 92.4 fps
|
76% 94.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 58 76 26 55 38 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
62% 280 MB/s
|
13% 7.13 MB/s
|
82% 100 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 172 176 170 174 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
101% 139 MB/s
|
150% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
96.1%
Outstanding
|
99% 34.7 GB/s
|
83% 29.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $648 |