Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 80.2 1-Core 113 2-Core 219 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 818 77% 637 Pts	64-Core 1182 73% 1182 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.5% Average	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 70.9 Parallax 90 52% 75.1 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 43.6 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 213 175 44 44 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 464 Mixed 350 SusWrite 118 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 48.5 163% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 127 157% 278 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 128GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 169 211 152 84 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 384 Mixed 407 SusWrite 140 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 47.5 165% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 236 209% 314 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 59GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 129 70 67 72 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 396 Mixed 412 SusWrite 99.4 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 48.2 165% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 227 205% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 376 390 446 464 472 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 670 Write 525 Mixed 563 SusWrite 419 122% 544 MB/s	4K Read 51.5 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 66.4 215% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 756 DQ Write 572 DQ Mixed 738 532% 689 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 410%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 170GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 170 212 268 273 274 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 467 Mixed 367 SusWrite 224 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 47.7 165% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 227 204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 118%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 58GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 115 125 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 118 Write 62.2 Mixed 68 SusWrite 123 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 2133, 2133, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	116% Outstanding	MC Read 47.5 MC Write 49.6 MC Mixed 41.7 132% 46.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	425x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	48x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16