Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 3.9 2-Core 9.5 24% 26.2 Pts	4-Core 9.1 8-Core 10.4 1% 9.75 Pts	64-Core 11.5 1% 11.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.6% Very poor	Read 98.2 Write 24.4 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 30.5 11% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.6 25% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 85%
Kingston DTR30G2 64GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 50GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.56% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 17.3 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 19.9 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.56% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.31% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.2 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 1.07 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.31% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16