HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180123
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	May 03 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 679 73% 583 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.7 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 61.2 54% 64.5 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 60.5 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 69 110 118 138 139 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 365GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 262 261 261 262 262 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 359 Write 319 Mixed 237 SusWrite 265 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 25.5 73% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 144 105% 137 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 83%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 35GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.6 9.8 4.7 8.1 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.51% Terrible	Read 39.1 Write 5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 7.5 15% 15 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.51% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB 19,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	124x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	78x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	63x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	53x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	51x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	23x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 1,495 samples	17x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 714 samples	10x

RAM
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 2,884 samples	50x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	46x
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 2,510 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16