| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180622 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 01 '21 at 22:36 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.2%
Very good
|
79% 140 Pts
|
59% 446 Pts
|
30% 493 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23%
Poor
|
24% 29.9 fps
|
22% 27.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3900100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 376 340 373 349 100 MB/s
|
74.5%
Very good
|
66% 296 MB/s
|
89% 38.2 MB/s
|
89% 188 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
453GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 124 131 131 130 MB/s
|
71.4%
Very good
|
81% 110 MB/s
|
138% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
22.8%
Poor
|
20% 6.83 GB/s
|
21% 7.43 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,699 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,068x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 930x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 275x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 355x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 296x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 231x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |