Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 23:44
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 250
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 741
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,568
97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 202
Parallax 159
120% 169 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 438 447 448 451 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 472
Mixed 438
SusWrite 445
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 54
176% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 298
222% 295 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
250GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 2214 2224 2221 2170 2165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,606
Write 2,208
Mixed 1,545
SusWrite 2,199
480% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 75.5
254% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1031
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 938
682% 893 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 356%
Great: 393%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
92GB free
Firmware: CS303226
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,397
Write 2,085
Mixed 1,574
379% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 74.1
233% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,135
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 1,054
782% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 286%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
557GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 123 95 62 74 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 452
Write 319
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 86.5
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 14.3
69% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 66.5
DQ Mixed 15.4
32% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
463GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 467 472 473 474 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 482
Mixed 369
SusWrite 468
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 55.7
184% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 365
261% 337 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
445GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 467 472 473 473 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 482
Mixed 372
SusWrite 468
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 55.9
184% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 365
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
465GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 467 472 473 474 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 483
Mixed 371
SusWrite 468
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 55.5
184% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
439GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 370 329 328 328 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 483
Mixed 346
SusWrite 360
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 53.9
179% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 347
266% 361 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
464GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 485 485 485 484 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 484
Mixed 365
SusWrite 481
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 55.9
183% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 108
Write 122
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 124
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 109 109 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 75.5
Write 108
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 106
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback