PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100824 |
Uptime | 9.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 29 '21 at 19:37 |
Run Duration | 225 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 52 55 104 126 127 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 57 65 124 134 131 MB/s
|
66.3%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUP722020APA330 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA36C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 50 54 104 118 119 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
710GB free
Firmware: 02.S0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 46 49 84 88 86 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
37GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 26 30 50 54 54 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
53GB free
Firmware: MF8OA8B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 54 57 112 129 130 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
37.5%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 627x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 403x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 217x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 148x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |