Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201126
Uptime	12.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 77.3 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 177 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 298 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 7.3 5% 6.4 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 10.7 7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.1% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 46 Parallax 37.9 34% 41.8 fps	MRender 32 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 35.9 29% 34.7 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 645 740 727 791 649 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 712 Write 797 Mixed 696 SusWrite 650 161% 714 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 22.5 77% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 514 DQ Mixed 567 405% 514 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 181%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: JT000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 138 141 141 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 129 Write 122 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 140 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C4FE 16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 11.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 5.9 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,090x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,055x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	761x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	333x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	214x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	563x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	306x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	107x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16