Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 138 57% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 546 48% 411 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350X 1,137 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 0081) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	6.84% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 11 Parallax 13.4 7% 10.9 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 8.9 Splatting 8.1 7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.84% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
512gb QLC SATA S 512GB 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 371 103 16 285 371 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD My Passport 2628 2TB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 842GB free, PID 2628 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.2 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 27.1 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 55% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70DB0-YH9 M393B2G70DB0-YH9 M393B2G70DB0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-CH9 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 30.9 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16