PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus E3-PRO V5 (all builds) |
Memory | 24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160118 |
Uptime | 10.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 26 '21 at 15:01 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 110 110 107 109 104 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
603GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 178 177 178 176 177 MB/s
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples | 2x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 2x |
Xeon E3-1230 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,254 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 2x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $267 |