| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Studio XPS 8100 |
| Motherboard | Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091209 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 21 '21 at 23:45 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.6%
Good
|
55% 87.6 Pts
|
34% 266 Pts
|
17% 279 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Dell(1028 68E0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
1.46%
Terrible
|
1% 4.37 fps
|
3% 3.57 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 7.9 20 44 30 34 MB/s
|
20.5%
Poor
|
38% 51 MB/s
|
163% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
252GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 76 84 92 87 106 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
52% 70.3 MB/s
|
116% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.6%
Below average
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
55% 72.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 267x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 194x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 115x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 34x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $507 |