Jp.ik LEAP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJp.ik LEAP  (all builds)
MotherboardECS ik Educational Software
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Memory 20.6
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 23
15% 22.1 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 71.4
10% 74.6 Pts
64-Core 66.7
4% 66.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.5 fps
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.7
2% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 128GB 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1009A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 182 310 140 93 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 376
Write 230
Mixed 258
SusWrite 173
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 17
69% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 35.4
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.49% Terrible
MC Read 0.4
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 0.7
3% 1 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 316
13% 316 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LEAP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Jp.ik LEAP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback