Jp.ik LEAP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJp.ik LEAP  (all builds)
MotherboardECS ik Educational Software
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Memory 20.6
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 48.4
19% 32.2 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 66.7
10% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 64.4
4% 64.4 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.5 fps
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.7
2% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kimtigo 128GB 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1009A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 182 310 140 93 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 376
Write 230
Mixed 258
SusWrite 173
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 17
69% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 35.4
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
MC Read 0.4
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 0.7
3% 1 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 316
13% 316 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback