Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR) 13,243 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 88.6 45% 71 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 146 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5119) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 7.6 4% 6.33 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 5.9 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 202 230 229 227 230 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 446 Write 399 Mixed 290 SusWrite 235 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 40.6 134% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 260 191% 251 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB 42,779 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.2% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.4 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 33%, 13,243 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	2x

SSD
SQ500S37240G 240GBKingstonBench 74%, 1,214 samples	1x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 95%, 1,318 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	1x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16