Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210309
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 05:05
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 205
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 616
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 31.1
24% 29.9 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 21.6
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 805 780 775 751 706 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,131
Mixed 1,077
SusWrite 772
240% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 54.5
170% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 697
485% 617 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 178%
Great: 330%
Nvme SanDisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
918GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 961 862 818 833 835 808 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 1,078
Mixed 993
SusWrite 853
228% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 48.3
160% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 726
508% 652 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 174%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 19.3
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 11.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback