Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 48.1 1-Core 15.5 2-Core 27.7 23% 30.4 Pts	4-Core 30.1 8-Core 28 4% 29 Pts	64-Core 26.8 2% 26.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90F5) 2GB CLim: 921 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.89% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 11 7% 9.47 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.3 7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.89% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 138 197 166 226 159 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16