Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 95.9
33% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 195
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 164
11% 164 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$53
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 157 151 151 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 171
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 147
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 107%
ASolid USB 32GB
29GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 15 15 17 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 11.3
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 14.6
23% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.7
118% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 20,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop 79%
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $372
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback