Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote_RS66-U-320NC (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard H13VV
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '21 at 07:34
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4200-$99 5,474 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 30.8 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 38 19% 29.6 Pts	4-Core 46.3 8-Core 39.6 6% 42.9 Pts	64-Core 49.4 3% 49.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 7,025 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1631 C10C) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 55 56 45 54 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 64.8 Mixed 31 SusWrite 50.5 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 250 16% 250 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16