Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 96.8 38% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 187 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1084) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4475 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.9 2% 2 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 387 Write 300 Mixed 329 75% 339 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 38.3 105% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 284 214% 286 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GB 3,685 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	162x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	155x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	55x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	174x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	125x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
CV3-CE128 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 349 samples	9x
RBUSC180DS37128GH 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 216 samples	7x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	157x
D3L16D28MP-8G-ACER 1x8GBKingstonBench 21%, 339 samples	24x
AM1L16BC4R1-B1WS 1x4GBAdataBench 19%, 447 samples	22x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16