Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 85.8 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 106 58% 90.1 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 169 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 250G 250GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 137GB free Firmware: SVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 390 366 393 327 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 226 Write 73.7 Mixed 220 SusWrite 357 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 35.8 80% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 70.8 DQ Mixed 47.2 81% 169 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150 24,380 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: AV00 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 27 Mixed 14.5 16% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 77,702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	967x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	156x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	30x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16