| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 20:45 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
69% 116 Pts
|
31% 213 Pts
|
14% 224 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 098E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
|
0.31%
Terrible
|
0% 0.37 fps
|
0% 0.53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 64 67 23 12 19 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
58% 78.9 MB/s
|
110% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport 2626 4TB
669GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 26 27 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
35% 25.9 MB/s
|
141% 1.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.3%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,758 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 590x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 314x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |