Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10AN
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Memory 12.6
1-Core 9
2-Core 9.9
8% 10.5 Pts
4-Core 10.9
8-Core 24.4
2% 17.6 Pts
64-Core 2
0% 2 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Toshiba(1179 FA33) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 2 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Longline SSD 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 172 90 155 108 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 300
Write 271
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 128
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 10.7
25% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 47.7
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 28.9
25% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 M471B5173BH0-YK0 6GB
1066, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.7
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 380
10% 380 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SATELLITE C55D-A-14M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14M

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback