Asrock Z97 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 506
68% 502 Pts
64-Core 500
34% 500 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2242 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
88% 112 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 107
Splatting 106
86% 107 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 156 169 169 180 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 464
Write 163
Mixed 175
SusWrite 164
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 24.3
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 106
95% 152 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 76%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
77GB free
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 131 77 44 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49% Average
Read 458
Write 337
Mixed 278
SusWrite 104
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 13.8
69% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 16.7
31% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49%
Great: 57%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
103GB free
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 179 187 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 429
Write 183
Mixed 222
SusWrite 176
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 18.6
121% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 56
61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
74GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 107 122 31 20 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 155
Write 358
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 84.6
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 16.4
81% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 18.6
38% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 60%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$57
609GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 162
Write 142
Mixed 108
SusWrite 123
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$85
589GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 109 114 109 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67% Good
Read 123
Write 117
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 111
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-2400C11-4GAB 0420 F3-2400C10-4GZH 0420 F3-2400C11-4GAB 0420 F3-2400C10-4GZH 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 26.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z97 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $868
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $317Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback