Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Memory 13.8 1-Core 8 2-Core 17 8% 12.9 Pts	4-Core 20.6 8-Core 25.9 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 11.4 1% 11.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B5A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.16% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.16% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB 3,895 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQ6AK3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 67 88 116 108 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 144 Write 78.5 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 120 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 4.2 30% 9.5 MB/s	DQ Read 48.1 DQ Write 40 DQ Mixed 68 44% 52 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GB 3,980 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.4% Terrible	MC Read 1.5 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 370 11% 370 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 6.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	10x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	10x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $82Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	2x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $82

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16