Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$380
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 883
85% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,188
80% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$338
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 105
Parallax 109
91% 109 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 90.9
83% 107 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$150
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 78 75 77 78 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 495
Mixed 342
SusWrite 119
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.2
205% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 310
250% 353 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G 128GB
43GB free
Firmware: X2180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 336 336 337 336 330 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 321
Mixed 294
SusWrite 331
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 41.1
160% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 150
155% 254 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$38
240GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 143 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 147
Write 146
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 141
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/4G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $962
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $310Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback