Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191129
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 198 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 655 60% 504 Pts	64-Core 1132 70% 1132 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Asus(1043 0577) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.4% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 142 Parallax 207 102% 158 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 133 Splatting 95.1 91% 113 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 407 435 443 405 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 452 Mixed 387 SusWrite 416 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 45.4 147% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.3 DQ Write 92.8 DQ Mixed 53.5 45% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 134%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 306GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 266 150 121 260 9.5 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 482 Write 428 Mixed 406 SusWrite 203 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 27 113% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 92.5 DQ Mixed 30.9 32% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 92%
Braveeagle 480GB 480GB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 262GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 406 413 417 420 387 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 460 Write 413 Mixed 312 SusWrite 406 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 32.9 110% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 39.2 35% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB 9,797 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 26.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 23.5 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $918

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16