Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH560
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 07:40
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 277
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 768
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 200F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 117
Parallax 8.4
5% 43.8 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB
164GB free
Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 205 278 295 302 527 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 1,811
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 373
286% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 58.9
194% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 268
337% 607 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 180%
Great: 249%
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2143 768 365 474 672 497 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,068
Write 2,032
Mixed 1339
SusWrite 820
298% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 55.6
177% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 850
636% 850 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 186%
Great: 403%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
74GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 76 78 79 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 115
Write 30.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 75.5
76% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.4
300% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25.1
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback