Asus K72Jk

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus K72Jk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K72Jk
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100329
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 450 8,084 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 35 1-Core 39 2-Core 58.1 27% 44 Pts	4-Core 93.1 8-Core 116 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C42) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 190 213 190 178 172 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 172 Write 152 Mixed 158 SusWrite 183 38% 166 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 16.3 53% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 134 105% 146 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 233GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 64 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 64.9 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GB 948 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K72Jk Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K72Jk

CPU
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	16x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	8x
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples	29x
Mobility Radeon HD 545vATIBench 1%, 267 samples	2x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	3x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	1x

RAM
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	10x
AD73I1B1672EG 802C 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 6GBUnknownBench 24%, 2 samples	2x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16