Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 117 50% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 326 34% 276 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.51% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.1 2% 3.23 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.51% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 52.8 Reflection 67 Parallax 54.9 43% 58.2 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 55.5 Splatting 53.6 42% 50.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB 18,999 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 352GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 515 475 510 455 504 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 840 Write 1,006 Mixed 970 SusWrite 540 189% 839 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 27.5 115% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 399 290% 376 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 213%
Nvme 128GB 128GB 1,238 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 80GB free Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 109 89 103 88 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 1,317 Write 569 Mixed 599 SusWrite 156 145% 660 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 16.4 91% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 376 DQ Mixed 339 266% 367 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 170%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 748GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 300 50 49 172 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 428 Write 363 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 171 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 28.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 24% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FN 2x8GB 386 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 23.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 19.3 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5,969x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,459x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	932x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,213x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,031x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	740x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	843x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	753x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	730x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16