| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7A36 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 01 '21 at 14:59 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.4%
Average
|
46% 62.9 Pts
|
22% 152 Pts
|
22% 359 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
|
21.3%
Poor
|
22% 30.2 fps
|
20% 25.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gamer L TA1D0240A 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 23 21 21 22 MB/s
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
7% 30.9 MB/s
|
36% 15 MB/s
|
22% 54.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
461GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 115 115 114 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
73% 98.8 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
24.3%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
18% 6.47 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 203 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 36x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 32x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $249 |