Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 14:45
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 40.8
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 51.4
25% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 303
22% 203 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 30%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (118 fps cap detected)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 113
Parallax 119
96% 116 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 118
Splatting 106
93% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 24 25 26 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 9.2
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 24.8
66% 316 MB/s
4K Read 163
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.7
251% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 116%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 24 23 23 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
474GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 315
Write 2.7
SusWrite 4.3
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 78.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
3,313% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
54GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 16 13 13 17 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 131
Write 50.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 13.8
72% 64 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.4
108% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 25.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $784
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback