PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z270P-D3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171108 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '21 at 23:05 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 40 59 39 80 15 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
182GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 98 101 99 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
33GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 23 23 23 18 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 662x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 381x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 273x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 255x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 242x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 210x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $510 |