Lenovo 20LNS13S00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 62% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20LNS13S00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LNS13S00
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 114
52% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 154
21% 153 Pts
64-Core 173
12% 173 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5071) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.3
3% 1.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt256g TOSHIBA 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0106ADLA
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 436
Write 299
Mixed 239
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 14.7
62% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 52.5
68% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 157%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback