Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq nw9440 (EY615EA#AKB) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 309F
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080711
Uptime	14.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	95%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7600-$130 622 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 42.8 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 51.5 26% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 36.1 8-Core 40.4 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 47.4 3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 38%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 35 33 43 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 14.1 Write 17.3 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 38.9 18% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16