Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 90.1 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 118 59% 92 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 174 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 220 211 202 193 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 445 Write 314 Mixed 326 SusWrite 208 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 31.7 105% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 343 262% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 124%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 12GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.9 9.8 8.1 9.8 9.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 1.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 9 9% 8.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GB 4,855 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	4x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 0443 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GBUnknownBench 44%, 243 samples	4x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 47 samples	2x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16