Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160503
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 03:11
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 680 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 76.6 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 107 50% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 421 37% 314 Pts	64-Core 1364 84% 1364 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 49.9 Reflection 46 Parallax 39.5 41% 45.1 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 37.4 24% 26.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 111GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3304643 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -71751723642261 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3469 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 321 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 38 49 68722688038 (C2) HDA temperature 38 49 68722688038 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3304643 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3304643 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3304643 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9953 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7635 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7635 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16383	51.3% Above average	Read 437 Write 112 Mixed 152 50% 234 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 14.4 78% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 75.7 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 28.9 40% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 914 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 432 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 46 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 144 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4376912886	86.2% Excellent	Read 505 Write 412 Mixed 418 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 31.9 114% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 57.8 62% 105 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 25GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3540 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1652 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 51 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 79 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1629108679	84.8% Excellent	Read 510 Write 410 Mixed 418 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 30 110% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 55 60% 101 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 115%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 398GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 137533824 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4956 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 23770244 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3331 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1515 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 672792616 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8094 (C2) HDA temperature 40 50 68719476776 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 84344567759889 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7760049480 (F2) Unknown 100 253 287341938104	86.5% Excellent	Read 155 Write 146 Mixed 118 104% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 5.29 4K Mixed 0.53 176% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KHX2800C14D4/8GX CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 KHX2800C14D4/8GX CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	107% Outstanding	MC Read 52.4 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 41.8 124% 43.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 14.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4P-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	56x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	43x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	15x
NVMe LITEON 512GBCx2-8b512-q11Bench 181%, 1,201 samples	7x
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 182 samples	10x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GBHyperX $165Bench 81%, 6,271 samples	8x
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 98%, 194 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16